Roulette Systems: Long Shot
Air Date: |
![]() | System Type: | ⬆️ Positive Progression |
---|---|---|---|
Buy-in: |
|
Bet per Spin: |
|
Total Bets: | $2,150 | Total Win/Loss: | -$675 |
Total Expected Loss: | -$113.09 | Total Comp Value: | $22.61 |
Total Spins: | 26 | Seconds between Spins: | 24 |
Rating: | JackAce Rating: |
Betting Simplicity: |
![]() |
Progression Simplicity: |
![]() |
---|---|---|---|
Chip Uniformity: |
![]() |
Jackpot Potential: |
![]() |
Scalability: |
![]() |
Comp Value: |
![]() |
Betting Schemes
Tier 1 ($50)| Tier 2 ($100)| Tier 3 ($150)| Tier 4 ($250)
View this bet in the Roulette Bet Analyzer
Progress to the next step on a win.
The fifth (final) tier is...I really hate the idea of making 15 different
bets, especially if the small bet uses
$5
chips when the previous
four tiers all use
$25
chips.
Also, this system has a Nolley Molley step, so you have to drop down the score some more.
Alex changed the system about half-way through the trial. Instead of betting 50 on an even money bet, he started betting $50 on a Dozen. So he started with a different bet, and he skipped the 2nd tier.
Apparently -$700 gets an rating?
Even with Alex's modified system...it retains the two shitty elements of this system: Too many pushes, and a shit ton of bets (15 bets on the top tier). I don't like the modified version.
Friend #1 Results
Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
|
+$50 | $50 | +$50 | 1:00 | |
2 |
|
+$50 | $100 | +$100 | 1:16 | |
3 |
|
-$150 WHACK |
$150 | -$50 | 1:32 |
Result displayed in video was
-$125
|
4 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$100 | 1:45 | |
5 |
|
+$50 | $50 | -$50 | 2:04 | |
6 |
|
+$50 | $100 | $0 | 2:22 | |
7 |
|
-$150 WHACK |
$150 | -$150 | 2:37 |
Result displayed in video was
-$125
|
8 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$200 | 3:01 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
9 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$250 | 3:24 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
10 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$300 | 3:31 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
11 |
|
+$50 | $25 | -$250 | 4:31 | Not a part of the system |
12 |
|
+$75 | $75 | -$175 | 4:52 | Not a part of the system |
13 |
|
-$150 WHACK |
$150 | -$325 | 5:40 | |
14 |
|
+$100 | $50 | -$225 | 6:09 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
15 |
|
-$150 WHACK |
$150 | -$375 | 6:33 | |
16 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$425 | 7:01 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
17 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$475 | 7:20 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
-$71.01 | $1,350 | -$475 |
Friend #2 Results
Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$50 | 7:37 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
19 |
|
+$100 | $50 | +$50 | 8:18 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
20 |
|
+$150 | $150 | +$200 | 9:09 | |
21 |
|
-$250 WHACK |
$250 | -$50 | 9:26 | |
22 |
|
+$100 | $50 | +$50 | 9:49 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
23 |
|
-$150 WHACK |
$150 | -$100 | 10:17 | |
24 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$150 | 10:26 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
25 |
|
-$50 WHACK |
$50 | -$200 | 10:40 | Not sure if this is a part of the system. In the beginning Alex said $50 should be on a one to one bet |
26 |
|
$0 | $0 | -$200 | 11:24 | |
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
-$42.08 | $800 | -$200 |