Roulette Systems: Dangerous System 🧨
Air Date: |
![]() | System Type: | ⬇️ Negative Progression |
---|---|---|---|
Buy-in: |
|
Bet per Spin: |
|
Total Bets: | $17,480 | Total Win/Loss: | +$9,800 |
Total Expected Loss: | -$919.44 | Total Comp Value: | $183.88 |
Total Spins: | 15 | Seconds between Spins: | 54 |
Rating: | JackAce Rating: |
Betting Simplicity: |
![]() |
Progression Simplicity: |
![]() |
---|---|---|---|
Chip Uniformity: |
![]() |
Jackpot Potential: |
![]() |
Scalability: |
![]() |
Comp Value: |
![]() |
Betting Schemes
Tier 1 ($60)| Tier 2 ($140)| Tier 3 ($320)| Tier 4 ($720)| Tier 5 ($1600)
View this bet in the Roulette Bet Analyzer
Here, we're just going to track David's system. There is already a review of Vertigo 😵💫😵💫 , which is the system Alex was playing for this session. This system is a system presented by another unnamed YouTuber.
They wanted to present this system because they thought the other YouTuber was being irresponsible by saying that this was a great money making system. The CEG guys thought the system was just plain dangerous.
To play this system, bet $25 each on two Dozens. Also bet $5 each on two numbers Straight-Up WITHIN those Dozens. If you miss the Straight-Up bets, then Martingale ALL bets AND add two more Straight-Up bets at the elevated levels.
So 2x$25 + 2x$5 becomes 2x$50 + 4x$10. And that becomes 2x$100 + 6x$20.
Even though the buy-in is $5,000, David ended up dipping in for a total of $6,600 before finally hitting his jackpot. David ended up over +$9,000 at the end.
I don't have the same disdain for this system as CEG, but then again I don't know how hard the other YouTuber was pushing this system. This system isn't the WORST I've seen, but I agree that you're risking a lot of money on a system that is likely to miss those Straight-Up bets. Things can spiral out of control pretty quickly.
I've only shown the first few tiers of this system, but I think you can figure out the rest based on my description above.
Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
|
+$15 | $60 | +$15 | 3:04 | |
2 |
|
-$140 WHACK |
$140 | -$125 | 3:46 | |
3 |
|
-$320 WHACK |
$320 | -$445 | 4:26 | |
4 |
|
-$120 | $720 | -$565 | 5:16 |
Result displayed in video was
-$320
|
5 |
|
+$2,580 | $1,600 | +$2,015 | 6:13 | |
6 |
|
-$60 WHACK |
$60 | +$1,955 | 7:57 |
Result displayed in video was
+$15
|
7 |
|
+$10 | $140 | +$1,965 | 8:23 |
Result displayed in video was
+$20
|
8 |
|
-$440 WHACK |
$440 | +$1,525 | 9:02 |
Result displayed in video was
-$320
David may have made a mistake here. I think it should have been $100 on two dozens and $20 on six straight up bets for a $320 total bet |
9 |
|
+$2,640 | $1,440 | +$4,165 | 9:21 |
Result displayed in video was
+$2,580
David thought he had $200 on two dozens previously but it was actually $100 each |
10 |
|
+$15 | $60 | +$4,180 | 10:30 |
Result displayed in video was
+$2,580
|
11 |
|
-$180 WHACK |
$180 | +$4,000 | 11:10 | Not sure if he's purposefully modifying the system at this point but the straight up bets should have been $10 each, not $20 |
12 |
|
-$40 | $640 | +$3,960 | 12:02 |
Result displayed in video was
-$380
|
13 |
|
-$240 | $1,440 | +$3,720 | 12:32 | |
14 |
|
-$3,200 WHACK |
$3,200 | +$520 | 13:50 | |
15 |
|
+$9,280 | $7,040 | +$9,800 | 16:47 | |
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
-$919.44 | $17,480 | +$9,800 |