Roulette Systems: Big Licky
| Air Date: |
 22 Dec 2021
| System Type: | 😐 Flat Bet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buy-in: |
$300 |
Bet per Spin: |
$67 |
| Total Bets: | $737 | Total Win/Loss: | +$99 |
| Total Expected Loss: | -$38.76 | Total Comp Value: | $7.75 |
| Total Spins: | 11 | Seconds between Spins: | 57 |
| Rating: |
B
- Peach
| JackAce Rating: |
C
- Plum
|
| Betting Simplicity: |
|
Progression Simplicity: |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Uniformity: |
|
Jackpot Potential: |
|
| Scalability: |
|
Comp Value: |
|
Betting Scheme
Tier 1 ($67)![Tier 1 ($67)](javascript:displayRbaImage('/assets/img/systems/2021-12-22/00-rba-0-800x768.png', '{"wheelType":1, "wagers":{"x1-6":2, "x1-9":2, "x1-24":2, "x1-26":2, "x1-27":2, "x1-29":2, "x1-33":2, "x1-36":2, "x1-16":3, "x18-high":20, "x12-doz1":28}}');){kind=link}
View this bet in the Roulette Bet Analyzer
Just a simple 😐 Flat Bet system. It's a bit absurd betting random values like $28 on the dozen and $2 or $3 on the straight-up bets.
They kept saying that the bet was $69, but it was only $67. If only CEG used the Roulette Bet Analyzer.
I wouldn't play a system with all these random bets. Much better to keep the values as multiples of $5 and bet multi-number bets instead of straight-up.
The main player said they were
up
+$102,
but I have them being
up
+$99.
| Spin # | Number | Result | Amount Bet | Running Total | Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
+$17 | $67 | +$17 | 1:40 | |
| 2 |
|
-$27 | $67 | -$10 | 2:47 | |
| 3 |
|
+$45 | $67 | +$35 | 3:52 | |
| 4 |
|
+$17 | $67 | +$52 | 5:12 | |
| 5 |
|
+$17 | $67 | +$69 | 6:07 | |
| 6 |
|
+$17 | $67 | +$86 | 7:05 | |
| 7 |
|
-$67 WHACK |
$67 | +$19 | 8:03 | |
| 8 |
|
+$45 | $67 | +$64 | 9:08 | |
| 9 |
|
+$17 | $67 | +$81 | 10:22 | |
| 10 |
|
-$27 | $67 | +$54 | 11:15 | |
| 11 |
|
+$45 | $67 | +$99 | 12:10 | |
|
Expected Loss |
Total Bets |
Total Win/Loss |
||||
| -$38.76 | $737 | +$99 |